ビデオ詳細
|
自家骨による骨造成-Part 4: 縫合と減張切開
解説:
In part 4 of this video instructional series of a cortical autogenous graft harvested from the ramus buccal shelf, Dr. Michael Pikos demonstrates the surgical techniques for suturing and tension free closure which are absolutely required for successful osseous augmentation procedures.
追加された日:
2009/04/21
著者:
Michael A Pikos, DDS
Dr. Michael A. Pikos - Dr. Pikos is originally from Campbell, Ohio. He attended The Ohio State University where he graduated Summa Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa. He also gradua...
[read more]
|
|
オンラインビデオ / Surgery / Bone Grafting / 自家骨による骨造成-Part 4: 縫合と減張切開
|
コンテントディスカッション
|
yazad gandhi - (2010/02/05 21:34)
Thanks Maurice,
Have taken a biopsy specimen lets see. Will keep you posted.
As regards the sterility breakdown that should not be the cause as it was done in the OT under strict asepsis.
Yazad Gandhi
|
Maurice Salama - (2010/02/04 6:25)
Dr. Gandhi;
A very rare case failure. Very difficult to assess the reason. Did you take a culture or biopsy of the fibrous tissues and black bone? It would be needed to see what type of bacteria was present. Did the patient have a significant medical history or did the patient have any post surgerical illness? Without this information it would be a guess as to why this may have occured. Without flap breakdown or significant medical issues, I see no reason for the failure other than sterility breakdown. The resorption of the bone, especially the Bio-Oss is almost impossible at 4 1/2 months? Do a oral gingival culture and a blood test on this individual and have an ENT to evaluate the health of their Sinus before performing any other surgical procedures.
Dr. Salama
|
yazad gandhi - (2010/02/04 5:39)
Dr.Pikos and Dr.Maurice,
Would like to know the reason for the failure of a case.
Did a Corticocancellous block graft fixation in the maxilla (iliac bone) in a case of Ectodermal Dysplasia. B/L sinus grafts were done using Autogenous & BIOSS 50:50 with biomend extend membrane. No perforations were there in the membrane which was tough n fibrous.
4 n 1/2 mths later the maxilla displayed fibrosis and upon reentry the graft had almost totally disappeared n left behind soft black bone as appears in aseptic necrosis. Almost all of the sinus graft has resorbed whichn has never happened with me till date and the membranes B/L are thinned out and perforated. All this despite there being no infective foci around.
Please comment on the possible causes.
Thanx
|
Maurice Salama - (2009/08/11 11:47)
Leonardo;
Difficult situation. If there is exudate the block is probably not going to do well and should be removed, irrigated and sutured before coming back to regraft at a later date. Would prefer grafting soft tissue prior to 2nd surgery to make sure you have good quality tissue to cover the bone graft. If the block was secure with no exudate, I prefer to grind the exposed bone down until I see a bleeding surface and see if we get epithelialization over the top. Normally, we lose the exposed portion at the least.
Good luck
Dr. Salama
|
Leonardo Diaz - (2009/08/10 19:37)
would like to know what colud I do with a patient with a deshicence in anterior maxilla after bone grafting.
I sutured tension free with dermis membrane alloderm the right site bone block is ok, but the left site is open with a little exudate after 15 days Post-op.
I take off partially the alloderm because a half was loose and the oter half fixed and sensitive pain.
i need to take a defenitive treatment, so could i do the flap again and a new alloderm leaving the bone block or taking this out.
|
Sean Peng - (2009/04/30 1:04)
Nice and smooth surgery.
I’m looking forward to see some videos about complication management during surgery, such as soft tissue bleeding, intra bony bleeding and sinus membrane perforation. I know it’s hard to collect that kind of video, but it makes Dentalxp different from other similar website. I think we should be able to manage complications comfortably before becoming a good surgeon.
|
Related Videos |
|
|
|
自家骨による骨造成-Part 2: サイトプレパレーション
Demonstration of site preparation for autogenous bone harvesting.
| Presented By: |
Michael A Pikos, DDS;Michael A Pikos, DDS |
| プレゼンテーションのスタイル: |
ビデオ |
| コミュニティーレート: |
|
|
今すぐ見る>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
自家骨による骨造成ーPart5 ケースレビュー
Detailed Case Review of a ridge augmentation case utilizing autogeneous bone harvested from the ramus buccal shelf.
| Presented By: |
Michael A Pikos, DDS |
| プレゼンテーションのスタイル: |
ビデオ |
| コミュニティーレート: |
|
|
今すぐ見る>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SonicWeld RX吸収性バリアシステムを用いたリッジオグメンテーションの革新的テクニック Pt2
Dr. Gerhard Iglhaut further describes a classification of bony and soft tissue types, 3D implant spacing instruments and an continues describing the evolution of bone augmentation technique including titanium reinforced gortex membranes, block fixation, ridge splitting, distraction osteogenesis, and the cortical shell and particulate technique.
| Presented By: |
Gerhard Michael Iglhaut, DDS;Gerhard Iglhaut, DDS |
| プレゼンテーションのスタイル: |
講義 |
| コミュニティーレート: |
|
|
今すぐ見る>>
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
|
The safety of bone allografts used in dentistry
Recent media reports concerning “stolen body parts”
have shaken the public’s trust in the safety of and the use of ethical practices involving human allografts. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the safety aspects of human bone allografts.
| 著者: |
Dan Holtzclaw, DDS, MS;Nicholas Toscano, DDS, MS;Lisa Eisenlohr, PhD; Don Callan, DDS |
|
論文を見る>>
|
|
|
|
|
Atrophic Posterior Maxillan and Mandible: Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction with Mandibular Block Autografts
Autogenous bone grafts have been used for many years for alveolar ridge augmentation and are still considered to be the gold standard for jaw reconstruction. The use of these grafts with osseointegrated implants was originally discussed by Brånemark et al., who used the iliac crest as the donor site. For repair of most localized alveolar defects, however, bone grafts from the mandible offer advantages over iliac crest grafts. These include the proximity of donor and recipient sites, convenient surgical access, decreased donor site morbidity and decreased cost. This article focuses on posterior maxillary and mandibular osseous augmentation in a staged approach for implant placement. Both horizontal and vertical deficiencies are addressed with the use of symphysis and ramus buccal shelf donor block bone via case presentations.
|
|
|
|